Some results I have contributed to.

Unraveling of Completely Bounded Divisible Dynamical Maps

1 / 3
Qunatum revivals captured by the influence martingale
2 / 3
More revivals
3 / 3
Crossover in computation time between master equation and quantum trajectories.
$$ \boldsymbol{\rho}_{t} = \operatorname{E} \Big{(}\mu_{t}\boldsymbol{\psi}_{t}\boldsymbol{\psi}_{t}^{\dagger}\Big{)} $$ We proved that any completely bounded divisible dynamical maps admis a representation as a statistical average over the solution of a Markov process taking values in the Hilbert state of the open quantum system. Applications are time continuous measurement interpretation and numerically efficient Monte Carlo algorithms for quantum master equation generating a semi-group.

Refined Second Law for Markov Processes

1 / 5
Optimal overdamped erasure protocol
2 / 5
Optimal transition \( [0.9,0.05,0.05]\to [0.05,0.05,0.9] \) for a jump process
3 / 5
Evolution of mean position and momentum for minimum entropy production transitions between Gaussian states for underdamped dynamics.
4 / 5
Erasure protocol between equilibria in the valley method description
5 / 5
Consequences of speed constraints on the protocol
$$ E\,\geq\,\mathrm{K_{B}}\,T\,\ln 2 $$ In a series of distinct collaborations, we proved that thermodynamic transitions in non-equilibrium thermodynamics described by Markov processes (overdamped, underdamped with arbitrary or kinetic plus potential Hamiltonian, pure jump ) always occur with average entropy production bounded away from zero. Optimal control problems are notoriously sensitive to the class of admissible protocols. In all the cases above, optimal protocol are smooth and non-equilibrium: the current velocity at the end of the control horizon is non-vanishing.
It is also possible to impose constraints (via valley method or via an upper bound ) on the protocols' acceleration. This is in my view a realistic way to inquire speed way to address speed limits and shortcuts to equilibration of therodynamic transitions.

Multiscaling in the Kraichnan Model of Passive Advection

$$ \mathcal{S}_{2\,n}(\boldsymbol{x};m)=\operatorname{E}|\theta(\boldsymbol{x};m)-\theta(\boldsymbol{0};m)|^{2\,n}\propto \|\boldsymbol{x}\|^{\zeta_{2\,n}(\xi)} $$ Kraichnan's model of passive advection is to-date the only PDE model of turbulence where intermittency and multiscaling can be proven in a mathematically controlled fashion. The result was first independently derived in the diffusion , large dimension , and laminar limits and numerically also by us here.
The connection between multiscaling and intermittency is due to the existence of statistical conservation laws, martingales, associated to shapes formed by Lagrangian particles in their many body translational invariant configuration space.
In retrospective, the result of Kupiainen et al. I am most pleased with, is having clarified the relation between quantum field theory methods and scaling predictions based on many body Hopf's equations.
Later here and here , I used these methods to exhibit how a geometric signature is encoded in the scaling exponent as their perturative expressions admits a classification in terms of Gel'fand-Zeitlin patterns of \(\mathrm{SL}(N\,,\mathbb{R})\) in agreement to an early general conjecture.

Functional Determinants in the Stationary Action Approximation

$$ \frac{\mathrm{Det}O_{\mathcal{A},t_{\mathfrak{0}},\mathfrak{t_{1}}}^{(u_{\mathfrak{1}})} }{\mathrm{Det}O_{\mathcal{A},t_{\mathfrak{0}},\mathfrak{t_{1}}}^{(u_{\mathfrak{1}})}}=\frac{\mathrm{det}(A_{\mathfrak{0}}+A_{\mathfrak{1}}\Phi_{*\, t_{\mathfrak{0}},\mathfrak{t_{1}}}^{(u_{\mathfrak{1}})})}{\mathrm{det}(A_{\mathfrak{0}}+A_{\mathfrak{1}}\Phi_{*\, t_{\mathfrak{0}},\mathfrak{t_{1}}}^{(u_{\mathfrak{1}})})} $$ A beautiful result by Robin Forman yields a powerful expression of functional determinants occurring in elliptic boundary value problems.
Functional determinants occurring in the stationary action approximation in finite dimensional Quantum Mechansics and non-equilibrium Statistical Mechanics admit an explicit expression for any elliptic boundary conditions.
In my Physics Report , I used Forman's result to present a new derivation of Gutzwiller's trace formula. In my view functional determinant theory offers a particularly appealing way to understand topological invariance of Masolv and Conley and Zehnder indices in periodic orbit theory.

The Concept of "Strong Anomalous Diffusion"

$$ \operatorname{E}|\xi_{t}-\operatorname{E}\xi_{t}|^{q}\propto t^{q\,\nu(q)} $$ In Castiglione et al (1999) we inquired the mechanisms underlying genuine multiscaling in diffusion processes. Strong anomalous diffusion appears in fine-tuned parametric regions of chaotic dynamical systems.
In such regions the interplay between self-similar bulk behavior of the statistics and ballistic transport for the rare excursions occasions non-linear corrections \( \nu(q) \) (typically "bifractal") to the diffusion scaling exponents. A grand theoretical challenge is the developmemt of an analytical theory to compute anomalous scaling exponents. This task can be accomplished only in special cases .